Results for:
Species: Shewanella sp.

Undec-1-ene

Mass-Spectra

Compound Details

Synonymous names
1-UNDECENE
821-95-4
Undec-1-ene
n-1-Undecene
1-Hendecene
Undecene
alpha-Undecene
alpha-Undecylene
alpha-Nonylethylene
Undecene-1
CCRIS 5720
HSDB 1090
.alpha.-Undecene
EINECS 212-483-7
NSC 73983
UNII-1446756A8F
NSC-73983
1446756A8F
DTXSID5061168
CHEBI:77444
MFCD00008956
Hendecene
68526-57-8
1-Undecene, 97%
N-NONYLETHYLENE
?1-UNDECENE
.ALPHA.-UNDECYLENE
1-UNDECENE [HSDB]
3,4-dichlorophenethylalcohol
.ALPHA.-NONYLETHYLENE
DTXCID0048268
NSC73983
EINECS 271-214-1
LMFA11000332
STL453737
AKOS009156849
MCULE-8437878932
LS-14020
DB-056580
NS00038169
U0025
U0052
D92764
EC 271-214-1
Q14745306
Microorganism:

Yes

IUPAC nameundec-1-ene
SMILESCCCCCCCCCC=C
InchiInChI=1S/C11H22/c1-3-5-7-9-11-10-8-6-4-2/h3H,1,4-11H2,2H3
FormulaC11H22
PubChem ID13190
Molweight154.29
LogP6.2
Atoms11
Bonds8
H-bond Acceptor0
H-bond Donor0
Chemical Classificationunsaturated hydrocarbons alkenes
CHEBI-ID77444
Supernatural-IDSN0062300

mVOC Specific Details

Boiling Point
DegreeReference
192.7 °C peer reviewed
Volatilization
The Henry's Law constant for 1-undecene is estimated as 1.48 atm-cu m/mole(SRC) using a fragment constant estimation method(1). This Henry's Law constant indicates that 1-undecene is expected to volatilize rapidly from water surfaces(2). Based on this Henry's Law constant, the volatilization half-life from a model river (1 m deep, flowing 1 m/sec, wind velocity of 3 m/sec)(2) is estimated as 1 hr(SRC). The volatilization half-life from a model lake (1 m deep, flowing 0.05 m/sec, wind velocity of 0.5 m/sec)(2) is estimated as 5 days(SRC). However, the volatilization half-life does not take into account the effects of adsorption. This is apparent from the results of two EXAMS model runs, one in which the effect of adsorption was considered, yielding an estimated half-life of 21 days in a model pond 2 m deep, and one in which the effect of adsorption was ignored, yielding an estimated half-life of 42 hrs in a model pond 2 m deep(3). 1-Undecene's Henry's Law constant(1) indicates that volatilization from moist soil surfaces may occur(SRC). 1-Undecene is not expected to volatilize from dry soil surfaces(SRC) based upon a vapor pressure of 0.493 mm Hg(4).
Literature: (1) Meylan WM, Howard PH; Environ Toxicol Chem 10: 1283-93 (1991) (2) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. Washington, DC: Amer Chem Soc pp. 15-1 to 15-29 (1990) (3) USEPA; EXAMS II Computer Simulation (1987) (4) Daubert TE, Danner RP; Physical and Thermodynamic Properties of Pure Chemicals: Data Compilation. Design Inst Phys Prop Data, Amer Inst Chem Eng NY, NY: Hemisphere Pub Corp 5 Vol (1989)
Solubility
Sol in ether, chloroform, ligroin; insol in water
Literature: Lide, D.R. (ed.). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 79th ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc., 1998-1999., p. 3-327
Soil Adsorption
Using a structure estimation method based on molecular connectivity indices(1), the Koc for 1-undecene can be estimated to be about 3180(SRC). According to a classification scheme(2), this estimated Koc value suggests that 1-undecene is expected to have slight mobility in soil.
Literature: (1) Meylan WM et al; Environ Sci Technol 26: 1560-67 (1992) (2) Swann RL et al; Res Rev 85: 17-28 (1983)
Vapor Pressure
PressureReference
0.493 mm Hg @ 25 deg CDaubert, T.E., R.P. Danner. Physical and Thermodynamic Properties of Pure Chemicals Data Compilation. Washington, D.C.: Taylor and Francis, 1989.
MS-Links
Massbank-Links

Species emitting the compound
KingdomSpeciesBiological FunctionOrigin/HabitatReference
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaNANAAhmed et al. 2023
ProkaryotaAcinetobacter BaumanniiNANAGao et al. 2016
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaNANAFitzgerald et al. 2021
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaNANAZechman et al. 1986
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaNANANeerincx et al. 2016
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaNANABoots et al. 2014
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaNANALawal et al. 2018a
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaNANANA
ProkaryotaPseudomonas PutidaNANANA
ProkaryotaPseudomonas FluorescensNANANA
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaNANAFilipiak et al. 2012
ProkaryotaShewanella PutrefaciensNANANA
ProkaryotaStenotrophomonas MaltophiliaNANANA
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaNANAJünger et al. 2012
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaNALawal et al. 2018
EukaryotaPythium OligandrumN/APythium oligandrum GAQ1 strain was isolated from soil from a field where infected ginger was growing in Laiwu district, Jinan City, Shandong Province, China. China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC) deposit number No. 17470.Sheikh et al. 2023
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaNATimm et al. 2018
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Fluorescensantibacterial activity against growth of Ralstonia solanacearumPlant Bacteriology Lab, Division of Plant Pathology, Indian Council of Agricultural Research - Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New DelhiKashyap et al. 2022
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Sp.antifungal activity against Thielaviopsis ethacetica mycelial growthBrazilian Biorenewables National Laboratory – LNBR/CNPEM Microorganism Collection, Campinas, SP; isolatedfrom soil and roots of highly productive sugarcane-producing regions; BrazilFreitas et al. 2022
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Aeruginosastimulate growth in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings depending on inoculum concentrationavocado trees (Persea americana) rhizosphereGamboa-Becerra et al. 2022
ProkaryotaBacillus Sp.stimulate growth in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings depending on inoculum concentrationavocado trees (Persea americana) rhizosphereGamboa-Becerra et al. 2022
ProkaryotaAneurinibacillus Aneurinilyticusstimulate growth in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings depending on inoculum concentrationavocado trees (Persea americana) rhizosphereGamboa-Becerra et al. 2022
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Palleronianaavocado trees (Persea americana) rhizosphereGamboa-Becerra et al. 2022
ProkaryotaArthrobacter Nicotinovoransstimulate growth in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings depending on inoculum concentrationavocado trees (Persea americana) rhizosphereGamboa-Becerra et al. 2022
ProkaryotaPantoea Vagansstimulate growth in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings depending on inoculum concentrationavocado trees (Persea americana) rhizosphereGamboa-Becerra et al. 2022
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Azotoformansstimulate growth of Solanum tuberosumisolate from Irish potato soilsHeenan-Daly et al. 2021
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaLeibnitz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbHFitzgerald et al. 2020
ProkaryotaBacillus Amyloliquefaciensn/aNALee et al. 2012
ProkaryotaBacillus Subtilisn/aNALee et al. 2012
ProkaryotaPaenibacillus Polymyxan/aNALee et al. 2012
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaShewanella Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Fluorescensn/aNAFernando et al. 2005
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Corrugatan/aNAFernando et al. 2005
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Chlororaphisn/aNAFernando et al. 2005
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Aurantiacan/aNAFernando et al. 2005
EukaryotaTuber Mesentericumn/aFortywoodland of the Basilicata regionMauriello et al. 2004
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Andropogonisn/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Anthinan/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Caledonican/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Caribensisn/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Caryophyllin/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Cepacian/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Fungorumn/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Gladiolin/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Glathein/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Glumaen/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Graminisn/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Latan/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Phenaziniumn/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Phenoliruptrixn/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Phytofirmansn/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Pyrrocinian/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Saccharin/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Terricolan/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Thailandensisn/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaCellulomonas Udan/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaChromobacterium Violaceumn/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaEscherichia Colin/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaLimnobacter Thiooxidansn/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Aeruginosan/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Fluorescensn/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Putidan/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaSerratia Plymuthican/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaKlebsiella Pneumoniaen/aNAElgaali et al. 2002
ProkaryotaShewanella PutrefaciensAmerican Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD or wild strains identified at the University of Kentucky Dept. of Animal Sciences Food Microbiology LaboratoryElgaali et al. 2002
ProkaryotaCitrobacter FreundiiAmerican Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD or wild strains identified at the University of Kentucky Dept. of Animal Sciences Food Microbiology LaboratoryElgaali et al. 2002
ProkaryotaEnterobacter AerogenesAmerican Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD or wild strains identified at the University of Kentucky Dept. of Animal Sciences Food Microbiology LaboratoryElgaali et al. 2002
ProkaryotaEnterobacter CloacaeAmerican Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD or wild strains identified at the University of Kentucky Dept. of Animal Sciences Food Microbiology LaboratoryElgaali et al. 2002
ProkaryotaEscherichia ColiAmerican Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD or wild strains identified at the University of Kentucky Dept. of Animal Sciences Food Microbiology LaboratoryElgaali et al. 2002
ProkaryotaShigella SonneiAmerican Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD or wild strains identified at the University of Kentucky Dept. of Animal Sciences Food Microbiology LaboratoryElgaali et al. 2002
ProkaryotaAcinetobacter JohnsoniiAmerican Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD or wild strains identified at the University of Kentucky Dept. of Animal Sciences Food Microbiology LaboratoryElgaali et al. 2002
ProkaryotaPseudomonas FluorescensAmerican Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD or wild strains identified at the University of Kentucky Dept. of Animal Sciences Food Microbiology LaboratoryElgaali et al. 2002
ProkaryotaLactobacillus LactisAmerican Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD or wild strains identified at the University of Kentucky Dept. of Animal Sciences Food Microbiology LaboratoryElgaali et al. 2002
ProkaryotaStreptococcus ThermophilusAmerican Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD or wild strains identified at the University of Kentucky Dept. of Animal Sciences Food Microbiology LaboratoryElgaali et al. 2002
ProkaryotaPseudomonas FluorescensNACheng et al. 2016
ProkaryotaPseudomonas PutidananaSchöller et al. 1997
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Fluorescensnasoil, water, plantsSchöller et al. 1997
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Aeruginosanasoil, water, skin floraSchöller et al. 1997
ProkaryotaPseudomonas TolaasiinanaLo Cantore et al. 2015
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Brassicacearumlyses red blood cellsrhizosphere of bean plants, southern ItalyGiorgio et al. 2015
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Putidalyses red blood cellsrhizosphere of bean plants, southern ItalyGiorgio et al. 2015
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Vranovensisinhibits the mycelial growth of P. infestans and changes its sporulation behaviorrhizosphere of field-grown potato plantsHunziker et al. 2015
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Veroniiinhibits the mycelial growth of P. infestans and changes its sporulation behaviorrhizosphere of field-grown potato plantsHunziker et al. 2015
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Chlororaphisinhibits the mycelial growth of P. infestans and changes its sporulation behaviorrhizosphere of field-grown potato plantsHunziker et al. 2015
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Fluorescensinhibits the mycelial growth of P. infestans and changes its sporulation behaviorrhizosphere of field-grown potato plantsHunziker et al. 2015
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Frederiksbergensisinhibits the mycelial growth of P. infestans and changes its sporulation behaviorphyllosphere of field-grown potato plantsHunziker et al. 2015
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosananaBriard et al. 2016
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Chlororaphisinhibits nematode developmentRhizosphere of maize, Kiev region, UkrainePopova et al. 2014
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Putidanablack pepper rootSheoran et al. 2015
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Putidapositive influence of the plant root growth and protection against soil-borne pathogensNASheoran et al. 2015
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Aeruginosacan be used as biomarker for detection of this bacteriaNAYusuf et al. 2015
ProkaryotaBurkholderia CepaciaRhizosphereBlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Trivialisn/aNAKai et al. 2007
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Fluorescensn/aNAKai et al. 2007
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Fragin/aNAErcolini et al. 2009
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaclinicPreti et al. 2009
ProkaryotaLentilactobacillus BuchneriNANASquara et al. 2022
EukaryotaSaccharomyces CerevisiaeNANAHarris et al. 2021
Method
KingdomSpeciesGrowth MediumApplied MethodVerification
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaNBTD/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaAcinetobacter BaumanniiBacT/ALERT SASPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaTSBSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaBHISPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaLBSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaTSBTD/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaBrain Heart InfusionTD/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaMueller–HintonTD/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaASMTD/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Aeruginosatrypticase soy agarTD/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Putidatrypticase soy agarTD/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Fluorescenstrypticase soy agarTD/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Aeruginosatryptic soy brothTD/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaShewanella Putrefacienstrypticase soy agarTD/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaStenotrophomonas Maltophiliatrypticase soy agarTD/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaColumbia sheep bloodTD/GC-MS and MCC-IMSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaLevine EMB agar (LEA) (Fluka Analytical, UK)GC-MSno
EukaryotaPythium OligandrumV8 juice agarSPME/GC-MS/MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaMOPS glucoseSPME, GC-MSyes
ProkaryotaPseudomonas FluorescensLB agarGC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Sp.LB media, DYGS media, ANGLE mediaHS-SPME/GC-MSyes
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaLB mediaSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaBacillus Sp.LB mediaSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaAneurinibacillus AneurinilyticusLB mediaSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas PalleronianaLB mediaSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaArthrobacter NicotinovoransLB mediaSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPantoea VagansLB mediaSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AzotoformansTSB media, MR-VP (Methyl Red-Vogos Proskeur) media, M+S (Murashige and Skoog) mediaSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaTSB mediaHS-SPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaBacillus AmyloliquefaciensTryptic soy agarSPME coupled with GC-MSno
ProkaryotaBacillus SubtilisTryptic soy agarSPME coupled with GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPaenibacillus PolymyxaTryptic soy agarSPME coupled with GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaShewanella Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Fluorescensn/an/ano
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Corrugatan/an/ano
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Chlororaphisn/an/ano
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Aurantiacan/an/ano
EukaryotaTuber Mesentericumn/amicroextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis (SPME-GC-MS)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia AndropogonisLB and MR-VPHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia AnthinaLB and AngleHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia CaledonicaAngleHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia CaribensisAngle and MR-VPHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia CaryophylliLB Headspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia CepaciaAngleHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia FungorumLB and AngleHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia GladioliLB Headspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia GlatheiLB and AngleHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia GlumaeLB Headspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia GraminisMR-VPHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia LataLB and AngleHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia LataMR-VPHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia PhenaziniumLB and AngleHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia PhenoliruptrixLB Headspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia PhytofirmansLB Headspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia PyrrociniaLB Headspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia SacchariLB and MR-VPHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia TerricolaLB Headspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia ThailandensisLB and MR-VPHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaCellulomonas UdaLB and MR-VPHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaChromobacterium ViolaceumMR-VPHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaEscherichia ColiLB and AngleHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaLimnobacter ThiooxidansLB and MR-VPHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Aeruginosa LB, MR-VP, MS and AngleHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaPseudomonas FluorescensLB Headspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaPseudomonas PutidaLB, MS and MR-VPHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaSerratia PlymuthicaLB Headspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaKlebsiella PneumoniaeTS brothHS-SPME/GC-MS no
ProkaryotaShewanella PutrefaciensTS brothGC-MS Super Qno
ProkaryotaCitrobacter FreundiiTS brothGC-MS SPMEyes
ProkaryotaEnterobacter AerogenesTS brothGC-MS SPMEyes
ProkaryotaEnterobacter CloacaeTS brothGC-MS SPMEyes
ProkaryotaEscherichia ColiTS brothGC-MS SPMEyes
ProkaryotaShigella SonneiTS brothGC-MS SPMEyes
ProkaryotaAcinetobacter JohnsoniiTS brothGC-MS SPMEyes
ProkaryotaPseudomonas FluorescensTS brothGC-MS SPMEyes
ProkaryotaShewanella PutrefaciensTS brothGC-MS SPMEyes
ProkaryotaLactobacillus LactisTS brothGC-MS SPMEyes
ProkaryotaStreptococcus ThermophilusTS brothGC-MS SPMEyes
ProkaryotaPseudomonas FluorescensKings B + rif,+kann; PDA GC-Q-TOF-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas PutidaAB medium + 1% citrate or 0,02% citrate or 1% glucose +1% casaminoacid GC-FID,GC/MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas FluorescensAB medium + 1% citrateGC-FID,GC/MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaAB medium + 1% citrateGC-FID,GC/MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas TolaasiiKBSPME-GCno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas BrassicacearumKing's B AgarSPME-GC/MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas PutidaKing's B AgarSPME-GC/MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas VranovensisLB mediumGC/MSyes
ProkaryotaPseudomonas VeroniiLB mediumGC/MSyes
ProkaryotaPseudomonas ChlororaphisLB mediumGC/MSyes
ProkaryotaPseudomonas FluorescensLB mediumGC/MSyes
ProkaryotaPseudomonas FrederiksbergensisLB mediumGC/MSyes
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Aeruginosaminimal medium/ Brian mediumSPME-GC/MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas ChlororaphisLB mediumSPME-GC/MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas PutidaLuria Bertani AgarHeadspace GC/MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas PutidaTSBPropak Q adsorbent trap/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Aeruginosablood agar base (TSBA)SPME/GC-MS no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia CepaciaAngleHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)yes
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Trivialisn/an/ano
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Fragin/an/ano
ProkaryotaPseudomonas AeruginosaBlood agar/chocolate blood agaHS-SPME/GC-MS no
ProkaryotaLentilactobacillus Buchnerimaize silageHS-SPME coupled with GC-TOF MSno
EukaryotaSaccharomyces Cerevisiaemalt extract brothHS-SPME with GC-MSno


Iodomethane

Mass-Spectra

Compound Details

Synonymous names
IODOMETHANE
Methyl iodide
74-88-4
Monoiodomethane
Methane, iodo-
Methyljodid
Jod-methan
Methyliodide
Methyl iodine
Methyljodide
Iodometano
Joodmethaan
Metylu jodek
Iodure de methyle
CH3I
Monoioduro di metile
Halon 10001
Methyliodid
iodo-methane
RCRA waste number U138
Monoiodmethan
Iodmethan
iodo methane
NSC 9366
DAT010ZJSR
IODOMETHANE-13C-D3
CHEBI:39282
NSC-9366
MFCD00001073
MEI
Joodmethaan [Dutch]
Iodometano [Italian]
Methyljodid [German]
Methyljodide [Dutch]
Jod-methan [German]
Metylu jodek [Polish]
Iodure de methyle [French]
CCRIS 395
Monoioduro di metile [Italian]
HSDB 1336
EINECS 200-819-5
UNII-DAT010ZJSR
UN2644
RCRA waste no. U138
iodmethane
iodometane
iodomethan
iodornethane
methiodide
methyliodine
carbon-iodine
mehyl iodide
methy iodide
metyl iodide
Methyl-iodide
meth-yl iodide
1-iodomethane
ICH3
EC 200-819-5
METHYL IODIDE [MI]
METHYL IODIDE [HSDB]
METHYL IODIDE [IARC]
WLN: I1
CHEMBL115849
DTXSID0024187
Iodomethane, ampule of 100 mg
DTXSID60167860
InChI=1/CH3I/c1-2/h1H
NSC9366
BCP26570
BBL034228
Iodomethane, for synthesis, 99.0%
STL281179
AKOS009031541
Methyl iodide [UN2644] [Poison]
MCULE-1718786667
UN 2644
Iodomethane, purum, >=99.0% (GC)
Iodomethane contains copper as stabilizer
BP-11384
Iodomethane, SAJ first grade, >=93.0%
Iodomethane, SAJ special grade, >=99.5%
I0060
NS00001340
C18448
Iodomethane, puriss., redist., >=99.5% (GC)
Q421729
F2190-0170
Iodomethane, contains copper as stabilizer, ReagentPlus(R), 99%
Iodomethane, contains copper as stabilizer, ReagentPlus(R), 99.5%
Iodomethane, 2000 mug/mL in methanol: water (4:1), analytical standard
Iodomethane, 2M soln. in tert-butyl methyl ether (stabilized with Cu)
Microorganism:

Yes

IUPAC nameiodomethane
SMILESCI
InchiInChI=1S/CH3I/c1-2/h1H3
FormulaCH3I
PubChem ID6328
Molweight141.939
LogP1.5
Atoms2
Bonds0
H-bond Acceptor0
H-bond Donor0
Chemical Classificationhalogenated compounds
CHEBI-ID39282

mVOC Specific Details

Boiling Point
DegreeReference
42.5 °C peer reviewed
Volatilization
The Henry's Law constant for methyl iodide is 0.00526 atm-cu m/mole at 25 deg C(1). This Henry's Law constant indicates that methyl iodide should volatilize from water surfaces(2). Based on this Henry's Law constant, the volatilization half-life from a model river (1 m deep, flowing 1 m/sec, wind velocity of 3 m/sec)(2) is estimated as 1.3 hours(SRC). The volatilization half-life from a model lake (1 m deep, flowing 0.05 m/sec, wind velocity of 0.5 m/sec)(2) is estimated as 4.8 days(SRC). The Henry's Law constant in seawater of salinity 30.4 g dissolved inorganic matter/kg seawater was 0.00354 atm-cu m/mole at 20 deg C(4) indicating a lower volatization rate for methyl iodide in seawater(SRC). Dissipation of methyl iodide from open surface water was found to be primarily a result of volatilization(4). Experiments conducted under indoor conditions resulted in a first-order half-life of 29 hours under static conditions and 6.5 hours when stirred at low speed with a magnetic stirrer(5). After 6 days, less that 1% of the methyl iodide was detected as iodide ion. Methyl iodide's Henry's Law constant(1) indicates that volatilization from moist soil surfaces may occur(SRC). Methyl iodide is expected to volatilize from dry soil surfaces(SRC) based upon a vapor pressure of 405 mm Hg at 25 deg C(3).
Literature: (1) Hunter-Smith RJ et al; Tellus Ser B B35: 170-6 (1983) (2) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. Washington, DC: Amer Chem Soc pp. 15-1 to 15-29 (1990) (3) Boublik T et al; The Vapor Pressures of Pure Substances Amsterdam: Elsevier p. 51 (1984) (4) Moore RM et al; Chemosphere 30: 183- 91 (1995) (5) Gan J, Yates SR; J Agric Food Chem 44: 4001-8 (1996)
Literature: #Experiments were conducted to assess the volatilization loss of methyl iodide, applied at 30 cm, from 60-cm packed soil columns with different soils and under various soil surface conditions(1). In Greenfield sandy loam, the greatest cumulative loss occurred in nontarp applications, 94%, and the least in a high-barrier plastic tarp treatment, 75%. Volatilization losses with a polyethylene film was 90% and therefore this treatment was ineffective at preventing volatilization loss. Volatilization losses using a polyethylene film were significantly lower, 38% and 53%, from two soils high in organic matter and capable of rapidly degrading the chemical.
Literature: (1) Gan J et al; J Environ Qual 26: 1107-15 (1997)
Soil Adsorption
Using a structure estimation method based on molecular connectivity indices(1), the Koc for methyl iodide can be estimated to be 14(SRC). According to a classification scheme(2), this estimated Koc value suggests that methyl iodide should have very high mobility in soil. The soil/water distribution coefficient of methyl iodide in various soils were (soil, Kd): Greenfield sandy loam, 0.09; Linne clay loam, 0.15; Carsetas loamy sand, 0.16; and potting mix, 0.55(3).
Literature: (1) Meylan WM et al; Environ Sci Technol 26: 1560-67 (1992) (2) Swann RL et al; Res Rev 85: 17-28 (1983) (3) Gan J, Yates SR; J Agric Food Chem 44: 4001-8 (1996) (4) Gan J et al; J Environ Qual 26: 1107-15 (1997)
Vapor Pressure
PressureReference
4.05X10+2 mm Hg @ 25 deg CBoublik, T., Fried, V., and Hala, E., The Vapour Pressures of Pure Substances. Second Revised Edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1984., p. 51
Massbank-Links

Species emitting the compound
KingdomSpeciesBiological FunctionOrigin/HabitatReference
ProkaryotaRhizobium Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaSphingomonas Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaVariovorax Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaRhodococcus Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaRoseovarius Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaMethanobacterium Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaZoogloea Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaAlteromonas Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaDeleya Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaPhotobacterium Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaPseudoalteromonas Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaShewanella Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaVibrio Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaMyxobacterium Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaPlantibacter Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
Method
KingdomSpeciesGrowth MediumApplied MethodVerification
ProkaryotaRhizobium Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaSphingomonas Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaVariovorax Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaRhodococcus Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaRoseovarius Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaMethanobacterium Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaZoogloea Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaAlteromonas Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaDeleya Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaPhotobacterium Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaPseudoalteromonas Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaShewanella Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaVibrio Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaMyxobacterium Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaPlantibacter Sp.n/an/ano