Results for:
PubChem ID: 262

Butane-2,3-diol

Mass-Spectra

Compound Details

Synonymous names
2,3-butanediol
513-85-9
Butane-2,3-diol
2,3-butylene glycol
2,3-Dihydroxybutane
Dimethylene glycol
Dimethylethylene glycol
Pseudobutylene glycol
Sym-dimethylethylene glycol
DL-2,3-Butanediol
123513-85-9
MFCD00004523
DTXSID8041321
CHEBI:62064
(2S,3S)-(+)2,3-Butanediol
NISTC6982258
2,3-Butanediol, (R*,R*)-(.+/-.)-
2,3-butanodiol
35007-63-7
Butan-2,3-diol
CCRIS 5501
HSDB 1505
EINECS 208-173-6
BRN 0969165
2,3-Butanediol; >98%
UNII-45427ZB5IJ
(+/-)-2,3-BUTANEDIOL
NSC-249246
2.3-butanediol
2,3-butane diol
butane 2,3-diol
2,3-Butandiol
a 2,3-butanediol
2d-Pharmalyte(9ci)
a butane-2,3-diol
dimethyl ethyleneglycol
2,3-dihydroxy butane
2,3-dihydroxy-butane
D-2,3-Butane diol
dimethyl ethylene glycol
levo-butane-2,3-diol
meso-2,3-butane diol
a 2,3-butylene glycol
2,3-Butanediol (DL)
2,3-Butanediol, 98%
DL-2,3-BUTANDIOL
EC 208-173-6
4-01-00-02524 (Beilstein Handbook Reference)
CHEMBL2312529
DTXCID6021321
45427ZB5IJ
(2R,3R)-(-)2,3-Butanediol
Tox21_300789
NSC249246
AKOS009031391
SB44226
SB44692
NCGC00248169-01
NCGC00254693-01
CAS-513-85-9
SY047189
SY057405
DB-027533
DB-243178
DB-335823
HY-128387
B0681
CS-0099502
NS00077458
S6040
EN300-19321
F14836
2,3-Butanediol, Vetec(TM) reagent grade, 98%
Q209157
METHYL5-ACETYL-3-ETHYLISOXAZOLE-4-CARBOXYLATE
F0001-1337
Z104473532
InChI=1/C4H10O2/c1-3(5)4(2)6/h3-6H,1-2H
Microorganism:

Yes

IUPAC namebutane-2,3-diol
SMILESCC(C(C)O)O
InchiInChI=1S/C4H10O2/c1-3(5)4(2)6/h3-6H,1-2H3
FormulaC4H10O2
PubChem ID262
Molweight90.12
LogP-0.9
Atoms6
Bonds1
H-bond Acceptor2
H-bond Donor2
Chemical Classificationalcohols diols
CHEBI-ID62064
Supernatural-IDSN0276724

mVOC Specific Details

Boiling Point
DegreeReference
182 deg C at 1 atmRiddick, J.A., W.B. Bunger, Sakano T.K. Techniques of Chemistry 4th ed., Volume II. Organic Solvents. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons., 1985., p. 270
Volatilization
The Henry's Law constant for 2,3-butanediol is estimated as 2.9X10-8 atm-cu m/mole(SRC) derived from its vapor pressure, 0.24 mm Hg(1), and an assigned value for water solubility of 1.0X10+6 mg/L (miscible)(2). This Henry's Law constant indicates that 2,3-butanediol is expected to be essentially nonvolatile from water surfaces(3). 2,3-Butanediol is not expected to volatilize from dry soil surfaces(SRC) based upon its vapor pressure of 0.24 mm Hg(1).
Literature: (1) NIST; Chemistry WebBook. National Institute of Standards and Technology Standard Reference Database Number 69 - March 2003 Release, Available from the query page at http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry as of Mar 3, 2005. (2) Riddick JA et al; Techniques of Chemistry. 4th ed. Vol II. Organic Solvents. NY, NY: John Wiley and Sons p. 270 (1985) (3) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. Washington, DC: Amer Chem Soc pp. 15-1 to 15-29 (1990)
Soil Adsorption
The Koc of 2,3-butanediol is estimated as 7.5(SRC), using a log Kow of -0.92(1) and a regression-derived equation(2). According to a classification scheme(3), this estimated Koc value suggests that 2,3-butanediol is expected to have very high mobility in soil.
Literature: (1) Hansch C et al; Exploring QSAR. Hydrophobic, Electronic, and Steric Constants. ACS Prof Ref Book. Heller SR, consult. ed., Washington, DC: Amer Chem Soc p. 10 (1995) (2) Lyman WJ et al; Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods. Washington, DC: Amer Chem Soc pp. 4-9 (1990) (3) Swann RL et al; Res Rev 85: 17-28 (1983)
Vapor Pressure
PressureReference
0.243 mm Hg at 25 deg CNIST; Chemistry WebBook. National Institute of Standards and Technology Standard Reference Database Number 69 - March 2003 Release, Available from the query page at http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry
MS-Links
1D-NMR-Links
Massbank-Links

Species emitting the compound
KingdomSpeciesBiological FunctionOrigin/HabitatReference
EukaryotaCandida AlbicansNANAFitzgerald et al. 2022
EukaryotaCandida ParapsilosisNANAFitzgerald et al. 2022
ProkaryotaStaphylococcus Saccharolyticusclinical isolateLemfack et al. 2016
ProkaryotaStaphylococcus Warnericlinical isolate,human skinLemfack et al. 2016
ProkaryotaErwinia AmylovoraNACellini et al. 2018
ProkaryotaBacillus Sp.KX395632.1Fincheira et al. 2017
ProkaryotaBacillus AmyloliquefaciensInhibition of fusarium oxysporum f.sp. Niveum; fresh weight of Arabidopsis seedlings increasedrhizosphere soils of watermelon plantsWu et al. 2019
ProkaryotaBacillus Amyloliquefaciens0rhizosphere soils of watermelon plantsWu et al. 2019
ProkaryotaPaenibacillus PolymyxaNAMülner et al. 2021
EukaryotaAspergillus FlavusITEM collection of CNR-ISPA (Research National Council of Italy - Institute of Sciences of Food Production) in Bari, ItalyJosselin et al. 2021
ProkaryotaBacillus Amyloliquefaciensstimulate growth of Solanum tuberosumcommercial strainHeenan-Daly et al. 2021
ProkaryotaBacillus Toyonensisstimulate growth of Solanum tuberosumisolate from Irish potato soilsHeenan-Daly et al. 2021
ProkaryotaBacillus Mycoidesstimulate growth of Solanum tuberosumisolate from Irish potato soilsHeenan-Daly et al. 2021
ProkaryotaSerratia Myotisisolate from Irish potato soilsHeenan-Daly et al. 2021
ProkaryotaPseudomonas Pseudoalcaligenespromotes the growth of Zea mays L. and confer the resistance to drought stress in this maizeApplied Microbiology and Biotechnology lab, Department of Biosciences, Comsats University IslamabadYasmin et al. 2021
ProkaryotaPantoea Vagansantifungal effect on the growth of Alternaria alternata, Corynespora cassiicola and Stemphylium lycopersici (pathogens of tomato plants)leaves of tomato plants (Elpida F1, Enza Zaden) with symptoms of Gray leaf spotLópez et al. 2021
ProkaryotaBacillus Sp.antifungal effect on the growth of Alternaria alternata, Corynespora cassiicola and Stemphylium lycopersici (pathogens of tomato plants)NALópez et al. 2021
ProkaryotaPaenibacillus Polymyxaantifungal effects against Rhizopus stoloniferisolated from an ancient tree Cryptomeria fortune and deposited in China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC No. 15733)Wu et al. 2020
ProkaryotaBacillus Velezensisinhibite the growth of Botrytis cinerea VG1, Monilinia fructicola VG 104, Monilinia laxa VG 105, Penicillium digitatum VG 20, Penicillium expansum CECT 20140, Penicillium italicum VG 107NACalvo et al. 2020
ProkaryotaBacillus Velezensisinhibite the growth of Botrytis cinerea VG1, Monilinia fructicola VG 104, Monilinia laxa VG 105, Penicillium digitatum VG 20, Penicillium expansum CECT 20140, Penicillium italicum VG 117NACalvo et al. 2020
ProkaryotaBacillus VelezensisNARiu et al. 2022
EukaryotaMrakia Blollopisinhibitory and promoting effects on the growth of different microorganismsisolate from Saxifraga cespitosa, Ny-Ålesund (Svalbard Archipelago, Arctic); CCTCC (China Center for Type Culture Collection, Wuhan, Hubei, China)Niu et al. 2022
EukaryotaTausonia Pullulansinhibitory and promoting effects on the growth of different microorganismsisolate from Silene acaulis, Ny-Ålesund (Svalbard Archipelago, Arctic); CCTCC (China Center for Type Culture Collection, Wuhan, Hubei, China)Niu et al. 2022
EukaryotaCystofilobasidium Sp.inhibitory and promoting effects on the growth of different microorganismsisolate from Silene acaulis, Ny-Ålesund (Svalbard Archipelago, Arctic); CCTCC (China Center for Type Culture Collection, Wuhan, Hubei, China)Niu et al. 2022
EukaryotaCystofilobasidium Capitatuminhibitory and promoting effects on the growth of different microorganismsisolate from Silene acaulis, Ny-Ålesund (Svalbard Archipelago, Arctic); CCTCC (China Center for Type Culture Collection, Wuhan, Hubei, China)Niu et al. 2022
ProkaryotaBacillus SubtilisInduce growth promotion (leaf surface area), systemic resistance (ISR) and regulate auxin homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana.NARyu et al. 2003
ProkaryotaBacillus AmyloliquefaciensInduce growth promotion (leaf surface area), systemic resistance (ISR) and regulate auxin homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana.NARyu et al. 2003
ProkaryotaClostridium Sp.n/aNAStotzky and Schenck 1976
EukaryotaTuber Borchiin/aNASplivallo et al. 2007
EukaryotaTuber Melanosporumn/aNASplivallo et al. 2007
EukaryotaTuber Mesentericumn/aFortywoodland of the Basilicata regionMauriello et al. 2004
EukaryotaTuber Aestivumn/aFortywoodland of the Basilicata regionMauriello et al. 2004
ProkaryotaChromobacterium Violaceumn/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaSerratia Proteamaculansn/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaStenotrophomonas Rhizophilan/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBurkholderia Thailandensisn/aNABlom et al. 2011
ProkaryotaBacillus Amyloliquefaciensn/aNALee et al. 2012
ProkaryotaBacillus Subtilisn/aNALee et al. 2012
ProkaryotaPaenibacillus Polymyxan/aNALee et al. 2012
ProkaryotaAzospirillum Brasilensepromotion of performance of Chlorella sorokiniana Shihculture collection DSMZ 1843Amavizca et al. 2017
ProkaryotaBacillus Pumiluspromotion of performance of Chlorella sorokiniana ShihNAAmavizca et al. 2017
ProkaryotaEscherichia Colipromotion of performance of Chlorella sorokiniana ShihNAAmavizca et al. 2017
EukaryotaSaccharomyces Cerevisiaegrape vineBecher et al. 2012
ProkaryotaBacillus Subtilistriggers induced systemic resistance (ISR) in ArabidopsisnaRyu et al. 2004
ProkaryotaBacillus Subtilistrigger induced systemic resistance (ISR)NARyu et al. 2004
ProkaryotaBacillus Amyloliquefacienstrigger induced systemic resistance (ISR)NARyu et al. 2004
EukaryotaTuber Sp.NASplivallo et al. 2007
ProkaryotaStreptomyces Sp.n/aNASchulz and Dickschat 2007
ProkaryotaLentilactobacillus BuchneriNANASquara et al. 2022
ProkaryotaLacticaseibacillus ParacaseiNANASquara et al. 2022
EukaryotaZygosaccharomyces RouxiiNANAPei et al. 2022
ProkaryotaBacillus AtrophaeusNANAToral et al. 2021
ProkaryotaBacillus VelezensisNANAToral et al. 2021
Meyerozyma GuilliermondiiXiong et al. 2023
Lentinula EdodesGeng et al. 2024
Bacillus SafensisKoilybayeva et al. 2023
Method
KingdomSpeciesGrowth MediumApplied MethodVerification
EukaryotaCandida AlbicansYPDSPME/GC-MSno
EukaryotaCandida ParapsilosisYPDSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaStaphylococcus Saccharolyticusbrain heart infusion mediumPorapak / GC/MSno
ProkaryotaStaphylococcus Warneribrain heart infusion mediumPorapak / GC/MSno
ProkaryotaErwinia AmylovoraLuria-Bertani (LB)PTR-MS / SPME / GC-MSno
ProkaryotaBacillus Sp.Plate Count agar (PCA)GC–MSyes
ProkaryotaBacillus Sp.Methyl Red & Voges Proskauer broth (MRVP-B)SPME, GC-MSyes
ProkaryotaBacillus Amyloliquefaciensmodified Murashige-Skoog (MS) culture mediumSPME-GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPaenibacillus PolymyxaLandy mediaHS-SPME/GC-MSno
EukaryotaAspergillus FlavusSNA mediaSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaBacillus AmyloliquefaciensTSB media, MR-VP (Methyl Red-Vogos Proskeur) mediaSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaBacillus ToyonensisTSB media, MR-VP (Methyl Red-Vogos Proskeur) mediaSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaBacillus MycoidesTSB media, MR-VP (Methyl Red-Vogos Proskeur) mediaSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaSerratia MyotisTSB mediaSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPseudomonas PseudoalcaligenesLB mediaSPME/GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPantoea VagansTYB mediaGC-MSno
ProkaryotaBacillus Sp.TYB mediaGC-MSno
ProkaryotaPaenibacillus PolymyxaLB agar and M49 (minimal) mediaSPME/GC-MSyes
ProkaryotaBacillus VelezensisMOLP mediaSPME/GC-MSyes
ProkaryotaBacillus VelezensisTSA mediaSPME/GC-MSno
EukaryotaMrakia Blollopisartificial nectar mediaGC-MSno
EukaryotaTausonia Pullulansartificial nectar mediaGC-MSno
EukaryotaCystofilobasidium Sp.artificial nectar mediaGC-MSno
EukaryotaCystofilobasidium Capitatumartificial nectar mediaGC-MSno
ProkaryotaBacillus Subtilisn/an/ano
ProkaryotaBacillus Amyloliquefaciensn/an/ano
ProkaryotaClostridium Sp.n/an/ano
EukaryotaTuber Borchiin/an/ano
EukaryotaTuber Melanosporumn/an/ano
EukaryotaTuber Mesentericumn/amicroextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis (SPME-GC-MS)no
EukaryotaTuber Aestivumn/amicroextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis (SPME-GC-MS)no
ProkaryotaChromobacterium ViolaceumMR-VPHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaSerratia ProteamaculansMR-VPHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaStenotrophomonas RhizophilaMS Headspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBurkholderia ThailandensisAngleHeadspace air was trapped in glass Gerstel TDS tubes and analysed by gas chromatography with mass selective detection (GC-MSD)no
ProkaryotaBacillus AmyloliquefaciensTryptic soy agarSPME coupled with GC-MSno
ProkaryotaBacillus SubtilisTryptic soy agarSPME coupled with GC-MSno
ProkaryotaPaenibacillus PolymyxaTryptic soy agarSPME coupled with GC-MSno
ProkaryotaAzospirillum BrasilenseTSASPME-GCno
ProkaryotaBacillus PumilusTSASPME-GCno
ProkaryotaEscherichia ColiTSASPME-GCno
EukaryotaSaccharomyces Cerevisiaesynthetic minimal mediumGC-MS, EIyes
ProkaryotaBacillus SubtilisMurashige and Skoog mediumcapillary GC;GC/MSyes
ProkaryotaBacillus SubtilisMurashige & Skoog medium containing 1.5% (w/v) agar, 1.5% (w/v) Suc, and 0.4% (w/v) TSASuper-Q adsorbent trap/GC-FID or GC-MSyes
ProkaryotaBacillus AmyloliquefaciensMurashige & Skoog medium containing 1.5% (w/v) agar, 1.5% (w/v) Suc, and 0.4% (w/v) TSASuper-Q adsorbent trap/GC-FID or GC-MSyes
EukaryotaTuber Sp.no
ProkaryotaStreptomyces Sp.n/an/ano
ProkaryotaLentilactobacillus Buchnerimaize silageHS-SPME coupled with GC-TOF MSno
ProkaryotaLacticaseibacillus Paracaseimaize silageHS-SPME coupled with GC-TOF MSno
EukaryotaZygosaccharomyces RouxiiYPD mediumGC-MSno
ProkaryotaBacillus AtrophaeusMOLPHS-SPME-GC/MSno
ProkaryotaBacillus VelezensisMOLPHS-SPME-GC/MSno
Meyerozyma GuilliermondiiYEPD, 10 g/L yeast extrac, 20 g/L peptone, 20 g dextroseGC-MS and GC-IMSno
Lentinula EdodesJiuqu (traditional wheat Qu)GC-IMSno
Bacillus Safensisbacteriological agar (BA, 15 g/L), gelatin peptone (GP, 5 g/L), and meat extract (ME, 3 g/L)GC–MSno